Silver Pinyon Journal

[ advertisement ]
[ advertisement ]
BLM reports Coeur Rochester in compliance with signage Print
Written by Dee Holzel   
Saturday, January 07 2012 10:45

LOVELOCK —  Although the matter of the temporary restraining order sought by Coeur Rochester Mine against Rye Patch Gold has been temporarily decided, some issues raised during testimony remained unsettled.

One of those issues was signage used by Coeur Rochester and whether or not employees/contractors of RPG had sufficient notice of the active mine site.  There was also testimony that some of the signage was only recently been added.

SPJ asked the Bureau of Land Management if Coeur Rochester was in compliance with signage requirements.  The response was delayed due to absences over the holidays of key personnel at the BLM.

Janet Hook responded to the request for information.  Hook is the BLM representative who inspects Coeur for compliance with federal regulations.

Hook explained it is not customary for the BLM to focus on the perimeter fence during mine inspections.  Instead, mine inspections are focused on the facilities to include the pit, heap leach pads and associated cyanide systems, waste rock facilities, etc.

She added the entire perimeter of the plan of operations has not been walked, but fences and appropriate signs have been encountered where expected.

Hook noted Coeur Rochester has not been cited or warned for failure to provide signs informing the public of the active mine site.  Further, appropriate signs have been noted at each of the primary access roads and some of the minor two-track roads where a gate had been installed in the fence.

Coeur and RPG are engaged in a legal battle over the mineral rights on more than 8,000 acres of the Coeur Rochester and Packard Mine.

The dispute erupted when RPG filed mining claims on property currently mined by Coeur.  The move by Rye Patch was made possible due to the failure by Coeur Rochester to pay $75,000 in federal maintenance fees on its claims, which were due on or before August 31.

On September 1 the claims were closed and the mineral rights became available for any member of the public to claim.

The legal dispute is currently in the 2nd Judicial District Court.

 
FacebookTwitterGoogle Bookmarks

Add comment

Comments will be reviewed prior to publishing, and may be edited for style and clarity. Your email address will not appear on the site.


Security code
Refresh

mini- Calendar

S M T W T F S
week 18 1 2 3 4 5
week 19 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
week 20 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
week 21 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
week 22 27 28 29 30 31

Events...

Thu May 24 @18:00
LHS Art/CTE Showcase

In your opinion...

Would you support using taxpayer dollars to buy and renovate the Winnemucca Hotel for local use?
 

Newest comments

  • I started listening to KWNA AM in over 20 years ag... More...
  • @ Ron & Whatever. Your points have been noted and ... More...
  • Hooray! I seen his name in the Detention Center In... More...
  • It's sad to leave it in its current state, but tea... More...
  • @Mario Gonzalez, I do have facts that will prove t... More...

Statistics

Content View Hits : 1337310