Silver Pinyon Journal

[ advertisement ]
[ advertisement ]
9th Circuit Court of Appeals upholds state statutes on brothel advertising Print
Written by An AG's Office Press Release   
Thursday, March 11 2010 11:38

CARSON CITY —  Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto announced today that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld Nevada state laws that limit brothel advertising.

“I am glad to see common sense has prevailed,” said Attorney General Masto.  “This state has had restrictions on brothel advertising for 40 years.  Nevada should have the right to have reasonable limitations on this type of activity.  I am pleased the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals corrected the decision by the lower federal court to overturn those long standing restrictions as violating the First Amendment.”

The laws had been challenged by the American Civil Liberties Union, together with the Shady Lady Ranch, a brothel in Nye County, and two newspapers, the High Desert Advocate and Las Vegas City Life.  The federal district court in Reno had upheld the challenge and invalidated the laws that prohibit brothel advertising in counties where prostitution is illegal.  The laws also prohibit brothel advertising in theaters and on streets and public highways.

“We are pleased that our State’s policies were acknowledged and our laws were upheld,” Masto said.  “Free speech is perhaps our most cherished right.  But prostitution is a difficult issue in every state.  The Circuit’s decision proves there are different ways to deal with the issue without trampling on First Amendment rights.”

The Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court’s decision.  It wrote: “Nevada has, uniquely for this country, delineated a more nuanced boundary [than total criminalization of prostitution], but still seeks to closely confine the sale of sex acts, geographically . . . and through the advertising restrictions.  We conclude that the interest in preventing the commodification of sex is substantial.”

General Masto added there has been no indication yet whether the ACLU and the other challengers will seek a rehearing, or whether they might appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

 
FacebookTwitterGoogle Bookmarks

Add comment

Comments will be reviewed prior to publishing, and may be edited for style and clarity. Your email address will not appear on the site.


Security code
Refresh

mini- Calendar

S M T W T F S
week 18 1 2 3 4 5
week 19 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
week 20 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
week 21 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
week 22 27 28 29 30 31

Events...

Mon May 21 @09:00
Board of Commissioners
Mon May 21 @10:45
Joint City/County Meeting
Tue May 22 @16:30
HCSD Board of Trustees
Thu May 24 @17:30
HGH Board of Trustees

In your opinion...

Would you support using taxpayer dollars to buy and renovate the Winnemucca Hotel for local use?
 

Who's Online

We have 293 guests online

Newest comments

  • Way to go guys!!!!! More...
  • Overkill........just like Quintin's temper? Just l... More...
  • Yes, Editor, thank you, we forgot that. You don't ... More...
  • This young man is not home yet, per family he is d... More...
  • Why didn't the community have the opportunity to v... More...

Statistics

Content View Hits : 1345041